Ethical and medico-legal problems concerning so-called hunger strikers
Identifieur interne : 003264 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 003263; suivant : 003265Ethical and medico-legal problems concerning so-called hunger strikers
Auteurs : RBID : Francis:610-95-10829Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
- Wicri :
- geographic : République tchèque.
- topic : Grève, Homme, Médecin, Médecine légale, Législation, Grève de la faim.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
In the Middle European medico-legal climate, the moral rule «salus aegroti suprema lex» has been accepted for a long time. In the last few years, under the pressure of fear of accusation of a paternalistic attitude, this postulate has been changed to «voluntas aegroti suprema lex». The question stands: Is this valid in each case and in all the situations? For example, it is possible to use compulsory treatment with those who have not given their informed consent. Even the charter of basic human rights and freedom states in its article 6 that everyone has a right of life. The law specifies in which cases an individual can be accepted or can be held in a health care institution without his/her consent
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Francis, to step Corpus: 000A32
- to stream Francis, to step Curation: 000A32
- to stream Francis, to step Checkpoint: 000A76
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 003264
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Ethical and medico-legal problems concerning so-called hunger strikers</title><author><name sortKey="Neoral, L" uniqKey="Neoral L">L. Neoral</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Univ. Olomouc, dep. forensic medicine medical law</s1><s2>77900 Olomouc</s2><s3>CZE</s3></inist:fA14><country>République tchèque</country><wicri:noRegion>77900 Olomouc</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="inist">610-95-10829</idno><date when="1994">1994</date><idno type="stanalyst">FRANCIS 610-95-10829 INIST</idno><idno type="RBID">Francis:610-95-10829</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Francis/Corpus">000A32</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Francis/Curation">000A32</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Francis/Checkpoint">000A76</idno><idno type="MainMerge">000A76</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">003264</idno></publicationStmt><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0379-0738</idno><title level="j" type="abbreviated">Forensic sci. int.</title><title level="j" type="main">Forensic science international</title></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Behavior</term><term>Czech Republic</term><term>Ethics</term><term>Health staff</term><term>Human</term><term>Legal medicine</term><term>Legislation</term><term>Physician</term><term>Starvation</term><term>Strike</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Jeûne alimentaire prolongé</term><term>Grève</term><term>Homme</term><term>Ethique</term><term>Médecin</term><term>Personnel sanitaire</term><term>Médecine légale</term><term>République tchèque</term><term>Législation</term><term>Comportement</term><term>Grève de la faim</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="geographic" xml:lang="fr"><term>République tchèque</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Grève</term><term>Homme</term><term>Médecin</term><term>Médecine légale</term><term>Législation</term><term>Grève de la faim</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">In the Middle European medico-legal climate, the moral rule «salus aegroti suprema lex» has been accepted for a long time. In the last few years, under the pressure of fear of accusation of a paternalistic attitude, this postulate has been changed to «voluntas aegroti suprema lex». The question stands: Is this valid in each case and in all the situations? For example, it is possible to use compulsory treatment with those who have not given their informed consent. Even the charter of basic human rights and freedom states in its article 6 that everyone has a right of life. The law specifies in which cases an individual can be accepted or can be held in a health care institution without his/her consent</div></front></TEI></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Linguistique/explor/CharterV3/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003264 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 003264 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Linguistique
|area= CharterV3
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= Francis:610-95-10829
|texte= Ethical and medico-legal problems concerning so-called hunger strikers
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.07. |  |